financial deepening thesis

• Search Menu
• Sign in through your institution
• Advance articles
• Featured articles
• Virtual Issues
• Browse content in B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches
• Browse content in B4 - Economic Methodology
• B49 - Other
• Browse content in C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods
• Browse content in C0 - General
• C01 - Econometrics
• Browse content in C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General
• C10 - General
• C11 - Bayesian Analysis: General
• C12 - Hypothesis Testing: General
• C13 - Estimation: General
• C14 - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
• C15 - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
• Browse content in C2 - Single Equation Models; Single Variables
• C21 - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models; Quantile Regressions
• C22 - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes
• C23 - Panel Data Models; Spatio-temporal Models
• C25 - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions; Probabilities
• C26 - Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation
• Browse content in C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables
• C31 - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models; Quantile Regressions; Social Interaction Models
• C33 - Panel Data Models; Spatio-temporal Models
• C34 - Truncated and Censored Models; Switching Regression Models
• C35 - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions
• C36 - Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation
• Browse content in C4 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics
• C41 - Duration Analysis; Optimal Timing Strategies
• C44 - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
• Browse content in C5 - Econometric Modeling
• C50 - General
• C51 - Model Construction and Estimation
• C52 - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
• C53 - Forecasting and Prediction Methods; Simulation Methods
• C54 - Quantitative Policy Modeling
• C55 - Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis
• C57 - Econometrics of Games and Auctions
• Browse content in C6 - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling
• C61 - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
• C62 - Existence and Stability Conditions of Equilibrium
• C63 - Computational Techniques; Simulation Modeling
• C67 - Input-Output Models
• C68 - Computable General Equilibrium Models
• Browse content in C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory
• C70 - General
• C72 - Noncooperative Games
• C73 - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games; Repeated Games
• C78 - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
• C79 - Other
• Browse content in C8 - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs
• C81 - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
• C83 - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
• Browse content in C9 - Design of Experiments
• C90 - General
• C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
• C92 - Laboratory, Group Behavior
• C93 - Field Experiments
• Browse content in D - Microeconomics
• Browse content in D0 - General
• D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
• D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
• D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
• Browse content in D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics
• D11 - Consumer Economics: Theory
• D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
• D13 - Household Production and Intrahousehold Allocation
• D14 - Household Saving; Personal Finance
• D15 - Intertemporal Household Choice: Life Cycle Models and Saving
• D18 - Consumer Protection
• Browse content in D2 - Production and Organizations
• D21 - Firm Behavior: Theory
• D22 - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
• D23 - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
• D24 - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
• D25 - Intertemporal Firm Choice: Investment, Capacity, and Financing
• D29 - Other
• Browse content in D3 - Distribution
• D30 - General
• D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions
• Browse content in D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design
• D40 - General
• D41 - Perfect Competition
• D42 - Monopoly
• D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
• D44 - Auctions
• D47 - Market Design
• Browse content in D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium
• D50 - General
• D51 - Exchange and Production Economies
• D52 - Incomplete Markets
• D53 - Financial Markets
• D57 - Input-Output Tables and Analysis
• D58 - Computable and Other Applied General Equilibrium Models
• Browse content in D6 - Welfare Economics
• D60 - General
• D61 - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
• D62 - Externalities
• D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
• D64 - Altruism; Philanthropy
• Browse content in D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making
• D70 - General
• D71 - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
• D72 - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
• D73 - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
• D74 - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
• D78 - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation
• Browse content in D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
• D80 - General
• D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
• D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
• D83 - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
• D84 - Expectations; Speculations
• D85 - Network Formation and Analysis: Theory
• D86 - Economics of Contract: Theory
• Browse content in D9 - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics
• D90 - General
• D91 - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
• D92 - Intertemporal Firm Choice, Investment, Capacity, and Financing
• Browse content in E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics
• Browse content in E0 - General
• E00 - General
• E03 - Behavioral Macroeconomics
• Browse content in E1 - General Aggregative Models
• E10 - General
• E12 - Keynes; Keynesian; Post-Keynesian
• E13 - Neoclassical
• E17 - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
• Browse content in E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy
• E20 - General
• E21 - Consumption; Saving; Wealth
• E22 - Investment; Capital; Intangible Capital; Capacity
• E23 - Production
• E24 - Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution; Aggregate Human Capital; Aggregate Labor Productivity
• E25 - Aggregate Factor Income Distribution
• E26 - Informal Economy; Underground Economy
• E27 - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
• Browse content in E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles
• E30 - General
• E31 - Price Level; Inflation; Deflation
• E32 - Business Fluctuations; Cycles
• E37 - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
• Browse content in E4 - Money and Interest Rates
• E40 - General
• E41 - Demand for Money
• E42 - Monetary Systems; Standards; Regimes; Government and the Monetary System; Payment Systems
• E43 - Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects
• E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy
• E49 - Other
• Browse content in E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit
• E50 - General
• E51 - Money Supply; Credit; Money Multipliers
• E52 - Monetary Policy
• E58 - Central Banks and Their Policies
• Browse content in E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook
• E60 - General
• E61 - Policy Objectives; Policy Designs and Consistency; Policy Coordination
• E62 - Fiscal Policy
• E65 - Studies of Particular Policy Episodes
• Browse content in E7 - Macro-Based Behavioral Economics
• E70 - General
• E71 - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on the Macro Economy
• Browse content in F - International Economics
• Browse content in F1 - Trade
• F10 - General
• F11 - Neoclassical Models of Trade
• F12 - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies; Fragmentation
• F13 - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
• F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade
• F15 - Economic Integration
• F16 - Trade and Labor Market Interactions
• F17 - Trade Forecasting and Simulation
• F18 - Trade and Environment
• F19 - Other
• Browse content in F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business
• F20 - General
• F21 - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements
• F22 - International Migration
• F23 - Multinational Firms; International Business
• Browse content in F3 - International Finance
• F30 - General
• F31 - Foreign Exchange
• F32 - Current Account Adjustment; Short-Term Capital Movements
• F33 - International Monetary Arrangements and Institutions
• F34 - International Lending and Debt Problems
• F36 - Financial Aspects of Economic Integration
• Browse content in F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance
• F40 - General
• F41 - Open Economy Macroeconomics
• F42 - International Policy Coordination and Transmission
• F43 - Economic Growth of Open Economies
• F44 - International Business Cycles
• Browse content in F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy
• F50 - General
• F53 - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations
• Browse content in F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization
• F60 - General
• F62 - Macroeconomic Impacts
• F63 - Economic Development
• F64 - Environment
• F65 - Finance
• Browse content in G - Financial Economics
• Browse content in G0 - General
• G01 - Financial Crises
• G02 - Behavioral Finance: Underlying Principles
• Browse content in G1 - General Financial Markets
• G10 - General
• G11 - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
• G12 - Asset Pricing; Trading volume; Bond Interest Rates
• G13 - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing
• G14 - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
• G15 - International Financial Markets
• G18 - Government Policy and Regulation
• Browse content in G2 - Financial Institutions and Services
• G20 - General
• G21 - Banks; Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
• G22 - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
• G23 - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
• G24 - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage; Ratings and Ratings Agencies
• G28 - Government Policy and Regulation
• Browse content in G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance
• G30 - General
• G31 - Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies; Capacity
• G32 - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
• G33 - Bankruptcy; Liquidation
• G34 - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
• G38 - Government Policy and Regulation
• Browse content in G4 - Behavioral Finance
• G40 - General
• G41 - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making in Financial Markets
• Browse content in G5 - Household Finance
• G51 - Household Saving, Borrowing, Debt, and Wealth
• Browse content in H - Public Economics
• Browse content in H0 - General
• H00 - General
• Browse content in H1 - Structure and Scope of Government
• H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government
• Browse content in H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
• H20 - General
• H21 - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
• H23 - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
• H24 - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies; includes inheritance and gift taxes
• H25 - Business Taxes and Subsidies
• H26 - Tax Evasion and Avoidance
• Browse content in H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents
• H30 - General
• H31 - Household
• Browse content in H4 - Publicly Provided Goods
• H41 - Public Goods
• H42 - Publicly Provided Private Goods
• Browse content in H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies
• H50 - General
• H51 - Government Expenditures and Health
• H52 - Government Expenditures and Education
• H53 - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
• H55 - Social Security and Public Pensions
• H56 - National Security and War
• Browse content in H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt
• H60 - General
• H63 - Debt; Debt Management; Sovereign Debt
• Browse content in H7 - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations
• H71 - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
• H75 - State and Local Government: Health; Education; Welfare; Public Pensions
• Browse content in H8 - Miscellaneous Issues
• H81 - Governmental Loans; Loan Guarantees; Credits; Grants; Bailouts
• Browse content in I - Health, Education, and Welfare
• Browse content in I0 - General
• I00 - General
• Browse content in I1 - Health
• I10 - General
• I11 - Analysis of Health Care Markets
• I12 - Health Behavior
• I13 - Health Insurance, Public and Private
• I14 - Health and Inequality
• I15 - Health and Economic Development
• I18 - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
• Browse content in I2 - Education and Research Institutions
• I20 - General
• I21 - Analysis of Education
• I22 - Educational Finance; Financial Aid
• I23 - Higher Education; Research Institutions
• I24 - Education and Inequality
• I25 - Education and Economic Development
• I26 - Returns to Education
• I28 - Government Policy
• Browse content in I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
• I30 - General
• I31 - General Welfare
• I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
• I38 - Government Policy; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
• I39 - Other
• Browse content in J - Labor and Demographic Economics
• Browse content in J0 - General
• J00 - General
• J01 - Labor Economics: General
• J08 - Labor Economics Policies
• Browse content in J1 - Demographic Economics
• J10 - General
• J11 - Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts
• J12 - Marriage; Marital Dissolution; Family Structure; Domestic Abuse
• J13 - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
• J14 - Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped; Non-Labor Market Discrimination
• J15 - Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants; Non-labor Discrimination
• J16 - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
• J17 - Value of Life; Forgone Income
• Browse content in J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor
• J20 - General
• J21 - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
• J22 - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
• J23 - Labor Demand
• J24 - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
• Browse content in J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs
• J30 - General
• J31 - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
• J32 - Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Retirement Plans; Private Pensions
• J33 - Compensation Packages; Payment Methods
• J38 - Public Policy
• Browse content in J4 - Particular Labor Markets
• J41 - Labor Contracts
• J42 - Monopsony; Segmented Labor Markets
• J44 - Professional Labor Markets; Occupational Licensing
• J47 - Coercive Labor Markets
• Browse content in J5 - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining
• J50 - General
• J52 - Dispute Resolution: Strikes, Arbitration, and Mediation; Collective Bargaining
• Browse content in J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers
• J60 - General
• J61 - Geographic Labor Mobility; Immigrant Workers
• J62 - Job, Occupational, and Intergenerational Mobility
• J63 - Turnover; Vacancies; Layoffs
• J64 - Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search
• J65 - Unemployment Insurance; Severance Pay; Plant Closings
• J68 - Public Policy
• Browse content in J7 - Labor Discrimination
• J71 - Discrimination
• Browse content in J8 - Labor Standards: National and International
• J81 - Working Conditions
• J82 - Labor Force Composition
• J83 - Workers' Rights
• Browse content in K - Law and Economics
• Browse content in K0 - General
• K00 - General
• Browse content in K1 - Basic Areas of Law
• K14 - Criminal Law
• Browse content in K3 - Other Substantive Areas of Law
• K31 - Labor Law
• K33 - International Law
• K35 - Personal Bankruptcy Law
• Browse content in K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior
• K40 - General
• K41 - Litigation Process
• K42 - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law
• Browse content in L - Industrial Organization
• Browse content in L0 - General
• L00 - General
• Browse content in L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance
• L10 - General
• L11 - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure; Size Distribution of Firms
• L12 - Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies
• L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
• L14 - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation; Networks
• L15 - Information and Product Quality; Standardization and Compatibility
• Browse content in L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior
• L20 - General
• L22 - Firm Organization and Market Structure
• L23 - Organization of Production
• L25 - Firm Performance: Size, Diversification, and Scope
• Browse content in L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise
• L31 - Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs; Social Entrepreneurship
• Browse content in L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies
• L41 - Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices
• L42 - Vertical Restraints; Resale Price Maintenance; Quantity Discounts
• L43 - Legal Monopolies and Regulation or Deregulation
• Browse content in L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy
• L50 - General
• L51 - Economics of Regulation
• Browse content in L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing
• L60 - General
• L62 - Automobiles; Other Transportation Equipment; Related Parts and Equipment
• L63 - Microelectronics; Computers; Communications Equipment
• L65 - Chemicals; Rubber; Drugs; Biotechnology
• Browse content in L7 - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction
• L71 - Mining, Extraction, and Refining: Hydrocarbon Fuels
• Browse content in L8 - Industry Studies: Services
• L81 - Retail and Wholesale Trade; e-Commerce
• L82 - Entertainment; Media
• L86 - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
• Browse content in L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities
• L93 - Air Transportation
• L94 - Electric Utilities
• L96 - Telecommunications
• Browse content in M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics
• Browse content in M0 - General
• M00 - General
• Browse content in M1 - Business Administration
• M11 - Production Management
• M14 - Corporate Culture; Social Responsibility
• Browse content in M2 - Business Economics
• M21 - Business Economics
• Browse content in M3 - Marketing and Advertising
• M31 - Marketing
• M37 - Advertising
• Browse content in M5 - Personnel Economics
• M50 - General
• M51 - Firm Employment Decisions; Promotions
• M52 - Compensation and Compensation Methods and Their Effects
• M54 - Labor Management
• M55 - Labor Contracting Devices
• Browse content in N - Economic History
• Browse content in N1 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics; Industrial Structure; Growth; Fluctuations
• N10 - General, International, or Comparative
• N13 - Europe: Pre-1913
• Browse content in N2 - Financial Markets and Institutions
• N20 - General, International, or Comparative
• Browse content in N3 - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy
• N30 - General, International, or Comparative
• N31 - U.S.; Canada: Pre-1913
• N32 - U.S.; Canada: 1913-
• N33 - Europe: Pre-1913
• N34 - Europe: 1913-
• Browse content in N4 - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation
• N42 - U.S.; Canada: 1913-
• N43 - Europe: Pre-1913
• N44 - Europe: 1913-
• N45 - Asia including Middle East
• Browse content in N9 - Regional and Urban History
• N90 - General, International, or Comparative
• N92 - U.S.; Canada: 1913-
• N94 - Europe: 1913-
• Browse content in O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth
• Browse content in O1 - Economic Development
• O10 - General
• O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
• O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
• O13 - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Energy; Environment; Other Primary Products
• O14 - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
• O15 - Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
• O16 - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance
• O17 - Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements
• O18 - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
• Browse content in O2 - Development Planning and Policy
• O23 - Fiscal and Monetary Policy in Development
• Browse content in O3 - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
• O30 - General
• O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
• O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
• O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
• O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
• O38 - Government Policy
• Browse content in O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity
• O40 - General
• O41 - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models
• O42 - Monetary Growth Models
• O43 - Institutions and Growth
• O44 - Environment and Growth
• O47 - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence
• Browse content in O5 - Economywide Country Studies
• O51 - U.S.; Canada
• O55 - Africa
• Browse content in P - Economic Systems
• Browse content in P0 - General
• P00 - General
• Browse content in P1 - Capitalist Systems
• P16 - Political Economy
• Browse content in P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies
• P26 - Political Economy; Property Rights
• P4 - Other Economic Systems
• Browse content in Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics
• Browse content in Q1 - Agriculture
• Q15 - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
• Q16 - R&D; Agricultural Technology; Biofuels; Agricultural Extension Services
• Browse content in Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation
• Q33 - Resource Booms
• Browse content in Q4 - Energy
• Q41 - Demand and Supply; Prices
• Q43 - Energy and the Macroeconomy
• Browse content in Q5 - Environmental Economics
• Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects
• Q52 - Pollution Control Adoption Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
• Q53 - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
• Q54 - Climate; Natural Disasters; Global Warming
• Q55 - Technological Innovation
• Q56 - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
• Q58 - Government Policy
• Browse content in R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics
• Browse content in R1 - General Regional Economics
• R10 - General
• R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
• R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity
• R13 - General Equilibrium and Welfare Economic Analysis of Regional Economies
• R15 - Econometric and Input-Output Models; Other Models
• Browse content in R2 - Household Analysis
• R21 - Housing Demand
• R23 - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population; Neighborhood Characteristics
• Browse content in R3 - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location
• R31 - Housing Supply and Markets
• R33 - Nonagricultural and Nonresidential Real Estate Markets
• Browse content in R4 - Transportation Economics
• R41 - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise
• R48 - Government Pricing and Policy
• Browse content in R5 - Regional Government Analysis
• R51 - Finance in Urban and Rural Economies
• Browse content in Z - Other Special Topics
• Browse content in Z1 - Cultural Economics; Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology
• Z10 - General
• Z12 - Religion
• Z13 - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Social and Economic Stratification
• Author Guidelines
• Submission Site
• Open Access
• About The Review of Economic Studies
• Editorial Board
• Advertising and Corporate Services
• Self-Archiving Policy
• Dispatch Dates
• Journals on Oxford Academic
• Books on Oxford Academic

Article Contents

• 1 Introduction
• 3 Analytical Characterization
• 4 Thai Economy: Growth, Inequality, and Financial Deepening
• 5 Set-Up for Numerical Analysis
• 6 Growth, Inequality, and Financial Deepening: Spurious Regressions
• 7 Growth, Inequality, and Financial Deepening: Examining the Model's Predictions
• 8 Microheterogeneity
• 9 Conclusion
• Appendix B: Numerical Algorithm
• Acknowledgments
• < Previous

Financial Deepening, Inequality, and Growth: A Model-Based Quantitative Evaluation 1

• Article contents
• Figures & tables
• Supplementary Data

Robert M. Townsend, Kenichi Ueda, Financial Deepening, Inequality, and Growth: A Model-Based Quantitative Evaluation, The Review of Economic Studies , Volume 73, Issue 1, January 2006, Pages 251–293, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2006.00376.x

• Permissions Icon Permissions

We propose a coherent unified approach to the study of the linkages among economic growth, financial structure, and inequality, bringing together disparate theoretical and empirical literature. That is, we show how to conduct model-based quantitative research on transitional paths. With analytical and numerical methods, we calibrate and make tractable a prototype canonical model and take it to an application, namely, Thailand 1976–1996, an emerging market economy in a phase of economic expansion with uneven financial deepening and increasing inequality. We look at the expected path generated by the model and conduct robustness experiments. Because the actual path of the Thai economy is imagined here to be just one realization of many possible histories of the model economy, we construct a covariance-normalized squared error metric of closeness and find the best-fit simulation. We also construct a confidence region from a set of simulations and formally test the model. We broadly replicate the actual data and identify anomalies.

Email alerts

Citing articles via.

• X (formerly Twitter)
• Recommend to your Library
• Journals Career Network

Affiliations

• Online ISSN 1467-937X
• Print ISSN 0034-6527
• Copyright © 2024 Review of Economic Studies Ltd
• About Oxford Academic
• Publish journals with us
• University press partners
• What we publish
• New features  
• Open access
• Institutional account management
• Rights and permissions
• Get help with access
• Accessibility
• Advertising
• Media enquiries
• Oxford University Press
• Oxford Languages
• University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• Cookie settings
• Cookie policy
• Privacy policy
• Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Advertisement

Impact of financial inclusion on economic growth, financial development, financial efficiency, financial stability, and profitability: an international evidence

• Original Article
• Published: 17 August 2022
• Volume 2 , article number  139 , ( 2022 )

Cite this article

• Shreya Pal   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9248-2582 1 &
• Indranil Bandyopadhyay 2  

856 Accesses

10 Citations

Explore all metrics

This study investigates the effect of financial inclusion on economic growth, financial development, bank’s financial efficiency, financial stability, and bank’s profitability in high-, low-, and middle-income countries by controlling income inequality, gross fixed capital formation, population growth, and inflation as key determinants. Using the annual data from 1984 to 2018, the long-run estimates from FMOLS and DOLS model reveal whether financial inclusion spurs economic growth, financial development with financial institutions and markets, bank’s financial efficiency, financial stability, and bank’s profitability in each level of income group. From the above findings, it is clear that more percentages of the population in every country must be brought under financial inclusion to achieve substantial growth in any economy as financial inclusion has a positive impact in the case of most of the models. From the policy perspective, the government should invest their fiscal money into the education sector, research and development, etc., which will connect financial inclusion to the financial sector. These findings also offer key macroeconomic policies. Analysing this perspective would contribute to the literature with broader relevance for all economies, mainly for low-income countries as they suffer from low GDP growth, poverty, unemployment, income inequality, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Examining the relationship between finance, institutions and economic growth: evidence from the ASEAN economies

Finance-Growth Nexus: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Model on ECOWAS Countries

Financial Sector Development and Economic Growth: The Case of ECOWAS Countries

Data availability.

The data can be available from the authors upon request.

Technological advancement into financial sector (cloud computing, big data, Fin Tech, and Big Tech technology) leads to low transition costs with high security financial activity. New and innovative technology is mostly focusing on the efficient and easily available financial product and services with high safety and security of the transactions in the banking system (Vives 2019 ). Therefore, financial inclusion can provide easily accessible financial products and services with high safety and security.

(Independent Evaluation Group 2008 ).

16 countries included in low-income countries are Burundi, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Dem. Rep, Gambia, The, Guinea, Haiti, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Nepal, Rwanda, South Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tanzania, and Uganda. 66 countries included in middle-income countries are Albania, Algeria, Argentina, Armenia, Bangladesh, Belize, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Cameroon, China, Colombia, Comoros, Costa Rica, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Arab Rep., El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Fiji, Gabon, Georgia, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Jamaica, Jordan, Kenya, Kiribati, Kyrgyz Republic, Lao PDR, Lebanon, Lesotho, Malaysia, Maldives, Mauritania, Mauritius, Micronesia, Fed. Sts., Moldova, Mongolia, Morocco, Myanmar, Namibia, Nicaragua, North Macedonia, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Samoa, São Tomé and Principe, Solomon Islands, South Africa, Suriname, Thailand, Tonga, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, and Zambia. 22 countries are included in high-income countries, such as Bahamas, The, Belgium, Brunei Darussalam, Chile, Cyprus, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Malta, Netherlands, Panama, Poland, Portugal, Saudi Arabia, Seychelles, Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, United Arab Emirates.

We cannot take full logarithm as some of the variables contains negative values.

Agbola FW (2013) Does human capital constrain the impact of foreign direct investment and remittances on economic growth in Ghana? Appl Econ 45(19):2853–2862. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2012.676735

Article   Google Scholar  

Ahamed MM, Mallick SK (2019) Is financial inclusion good for bank stability? International evidence. J Econ Behav Organ 157:403–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.07.027

Allen F, Carletti E, Cull R, Qian J, Senbet L, Valenzuela P (2014) The African financial development and financial inclusion gaps. J Afr Econ 23(5):614–642. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/eju015

Al-Mulali U, Fereidouni HG, Lee JY (2014) Electricity consumption from renewable and non-renewable sources and economic growth: evidence from Latin American countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 30:290–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.006

Anarfo EB, Abor JY (2020) Financial regulation and financial inclusion in Sub-Saharan Africa: does financial stability play a moderating role? Res Int Bus Finance 51:101070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101070

Ardic OP, Heimann M, Mylenko N (2011) Access to financial services and the financial inclusion agenda around the world: A cross-country analysis with a new data set. World Bank Policy Res Work Pap 5537. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1747440 . Accessed 1 Jan 2011

Athanasoglou PP, Brissimis SN, Delis MD (2008) Bank-specific, industry-specific and macroeconomic determinants of bank profitability. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 18(2):121–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2006.07.001

Babajide AA, Adegboye FB, Omankhanlen AE (2015) Financial inclusion and economic growth in Nigeria. Int J Econ Financ Issues 5(3):629–637

Google Scholar  

Bashier A-A, Siam AJ (2014) Immigration and economic growth in Jordan: FMOLS approach. Int J Humanit Soc Sci Educ (IJHSSE) 1(9):85–92

Beck T, Demirgüç-Kunt A, Levine R (2007) Finance, inequality and the poor. J Econ Growth 12(1):27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-007-9010-6

Bhattacharya M, Narayan P (2015) Output and labor productivity in organized manufacturing: a panel cointegration analysis for India. Int J Prod Econ 170:171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.09.020

Bittencourt M (2011) Inflation and financial development: evidence from Brazil. Econ Model 28(1–2):91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2010.09.021

Breitung J (2005) A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data. Econom Rev 24(2):151–173. https://doi.org/10.1081/ETC-200067895

Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47(1):239–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111

Bruhn M, Love I (2014) The real impact of improved access to finance: evidence from Mexico. J Finance 69(3):1347–1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12091

Cámara N, Tuesta D (2014) Measuring financial inclusion: a muldimensional index. BBVA Res Pap 14/26. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2634616

Chikalipah S (2017) What determines financial inclusion in Sub-Saharan Africa? Afr J Econ Manag Stud. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-01-2016-0007

Čihák M, Mare DS, Melecky M (2016) The nexus of financial inclusion and financial stability: a study of trade-offs and synergies. World Bank Policy Res Work Pap 7722. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811371 . Accessed 21 June 2016

Claessens S, Perotti E (2007) Finance and inequality: channels and evidence. J Comp Econ 35(4):748–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2007.07.002

Creane S, Mobarak AM, Goyal R, Sab R (2004) Financial sector development in the Middle East and North Africa. https://ssrn.com/abstract=879026 . Accessed Oct 2004

Cumming D, Johan S, Zhang M (2014) The economic impact of entrepreneurship: comparing international datasets. Corp Gov Int Rev 22(2):162–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12058

Demirgüç-Kunt A, Klapper LF (2012) Measuring financial inclusion: the global findex database. World Bank Policy Res Work Pap 6025. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2043012 . Accessed 1 Apr 2012

Demirguc-Kunt A, Klapper L, Singer D, Ansar S (2018) The Global Findex Database 2017: measuring financial inclusion and the fintech revolution. World Bank Publ. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhz013

Diniz E, Birochi R, Pozzebon M (2012) Triggers and barriers to financial inclusion: the use of ICT-based branchless banking in an Amazon county. Electron Commer Res Appl 11(5):484–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2011.07.006

Evans O (2015) The effects of economic and financial development on financial inclusion in Africa. READS. https://doi.org/10.26710/reads.v1i1.113

Gabor D, Brooks S (2017) The digital revolution in financial inclusion: international development in the fintech era. New Polit Econ 22(4):423–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1259298

Gupte R, Venkataramani B, Gupta D (2012) Computation of financial inclusion index for India. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 37:133–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.281

Holden K, El-Bannany M (2004) Investment in information technology systems and other determinants of bank profitability in the UK. Appl Financ Econ 14(5):361–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960310042000211623

Honohan P (2008) Cross-country variation in household access to financial services. J Bank Finance 32(11):2493–2500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.05.004

Ikram I, Lohdi S (2015) Impact of financial inclusion on banks profitability: an empirical study of banking sector of Karachi, Pakistan. Int J Manag Sci Bus Res 4(10):88–98. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3462963

Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econom 115(1):53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7

Independent Evaluation Group (2008) Consultative Group to Assist the Poor [Publication]. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/28056 . Accessed 11 Feb 2021

Kempson E, Atkinson A, Pilley O (2004) Policy level response to financial exclusion in developed economies: lessons for developing countries. Report of Personal Finance Research Centre, University of Bristol

Khan, H. R. (2011) Financial inclusion and financial stability: Are they two sides of the same coin. Address by Shri HR Khan, Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of India, at BANCON.

Kim J-H (2016) A study on the effect of financial inclusion on the relationship between income inequality and economic growth. Emerg Mark Finance Trade 52(2):498–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2016.1110467

Kim D-W, Yu J-S, Hassan MK (2018) Financial inclusion and economic growth in OIC countries. Res Int Bus Finance 43:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.178

Klapper L, El-Zoghbi M, Hess J (2016) Achieving the sustainable development goals. Role Financ Incl. https://www.cgap.org . Accessed Apr 2016

Kondo K (2010) Do ATMs influence bankprofitability in Japan? Appl Econ Lett 17(3):297–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850701720379

Lai JT, Yan IK, Yi X, Zhang H (2020) Digital financial inclusion and consumption smoothing in China. China World Econ 28(1):64–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12312

Lal T (2017) Impact of financial inclusion on economic empowerment of rural households. IIS Univ J Commer Manag 6(1):170–186

Le T-H, Chuc AT, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2019) Financial inclusion and its impact on financial efficiency and sustainability: empirical evidence from Asia. Borsa Istanb Rev 19(4):310–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2019.07.002

Lenka SK, Bairwa AK (2016) Does financial inclusion affect monetary policy in SAARC countries? Cogent Econ Finance 4(1):1127011. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2015.1127011

Levine R (2005) Finance and growth: theory and evidence. Handb Econ Growth 1:865–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01012-9

Mehrotra AN, Yetman J (2015) Financial inclusion-issues for central banks. BIS Q Rev March. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2580310 . Accessed Mar 2015

Mialou A, Amidzic G, Massara A (2017) Assessing countries’ financial inclusion standing—a new composite index. J Bank Financ Econ. https://doi.org/10.7172/2353-6845.jbfe.2017.2.5

Mirzaei A, Moore T, Liu G (2013) Does market structure matter on banks’ profitability and stability? Emerging vs. advanced economies. J Bank Finance 37(8):2920–2937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.031

Morgan P, Pontines V (2014) Financial stability and financial inclusion. ADBI Working Paper 488. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2464018

Neaime S, Gaysset I (2018) Financial inclusion and stability in MENA: evidence from poverty and inequality. Finance Res Lett 24:230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.09.007

Nyarko ES (2018) Financial Inclusion, Financial Literacy and Inclusive Growth in Africa. [PhD Thesis]. University of Ghana. http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/handle/123456789/30623 . Accessed July 2018

Olgu Ö (2014) Handbook of research on strategic developments and regulatory practice in global finance. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-7288-8

Ozili PK (2018) Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability. Borsa Istanb Rev 18(4):329–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2017.12.003

Pal S, Mahalik MK (2020) Factors driving financial development in top and bottom globalized developing economies: does economic globalization matter? J Public Aff. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2292

Park C-Y, Mercado R (2015) Financial inclusion, poverty, and income inequality in developing Asia. Asian Dev Bank Econ Work Pap Ser. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2558936

Park C-Y, Mercado R (2018) Financial inclusion: New measurement and cross-country impact assessment. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3199427

Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econom Theory 20(3):597–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073

Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econom 22(2):265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951

Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econom 142(1):50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010

Pesaran MH, Ullah A, Yamagata T (2008) A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence. Econom J 11(1):105–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x

Phillips PC, Hansen BE (1990) Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I (1) processes. Rev Econ Stud 57(1):99–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297545

Prasad ES (2010) Financial sector regulation and reforms in emerging markets: An overview. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 16428. https://doi.org/10.3386/w16428

Rajan RG (2009) A hundred small steps. Report of the Committee on Financial Sector Reforms (Planning Commission Government of India), pp 50–53

Rasheed B, Law S-H, Chin L, Habibullah MS (2016) The role of financial inclusion in financial development: International evidence. Abasyn Univ J Soc Sci 9(2):330–348

Ratnawati K (2020) The impact of financial inclusion on economic growth, poverty, income inequality, and financial stability in Asia. J Asian Finan Econ Business 7(10):73–85. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.073

Sahay R, Čihák M, N’Diaye P, Barajas A (2015) Rethinking financial deepening: stability and growth in emerging markets. Rev Econ Inst 17(33):73–107. https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v17n33.04

Sarma M (2008) Index of financial inclusion. Working paper. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/176233 . Accessed June 2008

Sarma M (2012) Index of financial inclusion—a measure of financial sector inclusiveness. Berlin working papers on money, finance, trade and development, 07/2012. https://finance-and-trade.htwberlin.de/fileadmin/HTW/Forschung/Money_Finance_Trade_Development/working_paper_series/wp_07_2012_Sarma_Indexof-Financial-Inclusion.pdf

Sarma M (2016) Measuring financial inclusion using multidimensional data. World Econ 17(1):15–40

Sethi D, Acharya D (2018) Financial inclusion and economic growth linkage: some cross country evidence. J Financ Econ Policy. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-11-2016-0073

Shihadeh F, Liu B (2019) Does financial inclusion influence the Banks risk and performance? Evidence from global prospects. https://scholar.ptuk.edu.ps/handle/123456789/703 . Accessed 2 July 2019

Shihadeh FH, Hannon AM, Guan J, Ul Haq I, Wang X (2018) Does financial inclusion improve the banks’ performance? Evidence from Jordan. Global tensions in financial markets. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0196-382120170000034005

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Svirydzenka K (2016) Introducing a new broad-based index of financial development. IMF Working Paper:16/5. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2754950 . Accessed Jan 2016

Swamy PA, Tinsley PA (1980) Linear prediction and estimation methods for regression models with stationary stochastic coefficients. J Econom 12(2):103–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(80)90001-9

Tran SH, Nguyen LT (2020) Financial development, business cycle and bank risk in Southeast Asian countries. J Asian Finance Econ Bus 7(3):127–135. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no3.127

Vives X (2019) Digital disruption in banking. Annu Rev Financ Econ 11:243–272. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-100719-120854

Wang X, Guan J (2017) Financial inclusion: measurement, spatial effects and influencing factors. Appl Econ 49(18):1751–1762. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1226488

Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x

Zhang Q, Posso A (2019) Thinking inside the box: a closer look at financial inclusion and household income. J Dev Stud 55(7):1616–1631. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2017.1380798

Download references

The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, 721302, India

Department of Master of Business Administration, Haldia Institute of Technology, Haldia, West Bengal, 721657, India

Indranil Bandyopadhyay

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

SP: writing–original draft, estimation, editing, final input, and revision. IB: idea proposed.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shreya Pal .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

There is no conflict of interest. The authors declare that no competing interest exists.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Pal, S., Bandyopadhyay, I. Impact of financial inclusion on economic growth, financial development, financial efficiency, financial stability, and profitability: an international evidence. SN Bus Econ 2 , 139 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-022-00313-3

Download citation

Received : 10 November 2021

Accepted : 29 July 2022

Published : 17 August 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-022-00313-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Financial inclusion
• Economic growth
• Financial institution
• Financial market

JEL Classification

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

The effect of institutional factors on financial deepening: evidence from 50 African countries

Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development

ISSN : 2635-1374

Article publication date: 29 March 2022

Issue publication date: 24 March 2023

This paper investigates the impact of institutional factors on financial deepening and its implications on bank credit in Africa.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper employs different panel econometric models to examine the heterogeneity of 50 African countries from 2000 to 2019. The estimators include panel corrected standard errors, system generalized method of moments, quantile and threshold regressions.

The results show that rule of law, regulatory quality, government effectiveness, voice and accountability, control of corruption and political stability significantly influence financial deepening in Africa. However, government effectiveness has a higher effect on middle- and high-income countries, while other indicators have a high impact on low-income countries. All institutional indicators have stronger effects, almost double, at higher financial depth levels than for countries with lower levels. Government effectiveness and regulatory quality impact financial deepening more for countries with strong institutions than weak ones. Thus, the relationship between institutional qualities and credit provided by banks is non-monotonic.

Practical implications

The findings suggest that strengthening appropriate institutional factors based on country heterogeneity may effectively stimulate debt financing in Africa, the primary source of financing for small and medium-sized enterprises and entrepreneurs.

Originality/value

The novelty of this paper is that previous studies did not sufficiently scrutinize the heterogeneity of the structure of African economies – i.e. differences in institution, credit and income levels.

• Financial deepening
• Institutional factors
• Bank credit
• Private sector

Sanga, B. and Aziakpono, M. (2023), "The effect of institutional factors on financial deepening: evidence from 50 African countries", Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development , Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 150-165. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBSED-12-2021-0175

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Bahati Sanga and Meshach Aziakpono

Published in Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development . Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode .

1. Introduction

Financial deepening has significant effects on attenuating financing constraints for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), enhancing capital and credit-raising services and stimulating entrepreneurship activities in an economy ( Beck, 2013 ; Cao-Alvira and Palacios-Chacón, 2021 ; Dutta and Meierrieks, 2021 ; Guiso et al. , 2004 ; King and Levine, 1993 ). Most private-owned firms, mainly SMEs, depend primarily on debt financing by financial institutions ( Berger and Udell, 2006 ). Thus, whether improving institutional quality enhances financial deepening in Africa is of immense importance for policymakers looking for different interventions to increase domestic credit. In recent years, institutional quality has received considerable attention in development finance as one of the critical determinants of financial sector development, foreign direct investment, public-private partnerships, aid inflows, financial inclusion and economic growth. However, few studies investigated the impact of institutional factors on Africa's financial deepening, and their findings are inconclusive ( Aluko and Ajayi, 2018 ; Aluko and Ibrahim, 2020 ; Fowowe, 2014 ; Kebede et al. , 2021 ; Ntow-Gyamfi et al. , 2019 ). The limited empirical studies analysed a few countries in Africa for a short period using either a few institutional indicators or constructing an institutional index using principal component analysis (PCA), thus were unable to attribute the impact of each institutional indicator. Lastly, previous studies used limited econometric methods, which do not account for the heterogeneity of African countries. Therefore, the effect of institutional factors on financial deepening has not been sufficiently examined in Africa.

The novelty of this paper is due to the following reasons. This paper examines the effects of six institutional indicators, individually and collectively as an index, on financial deepening in 50 out of 54 African countries for two decades. It analyses different scenarios including aggregated countries; comparing low-, middle- and high-income countries, contrasting countries with poor and robust institutional qualities and scrutinizing countries with different levels of financial depth. Finally, this paper employs different econometric methods to account for the heterogeneity of countries in Africa.

The six institutional factors explored in the study are regulatory quality, government effectiveness, control of corruption, voice and accountability, political stability and the rule of law. The empirical results from 50 aggregated African countries show that institutional qualities positively influence financial deepening, individually as six indicators and collectively as an index. However, two institutional indicators, voice and accountability and political stability, have less impact than the other four. Furthermore, government effectiveness has a high effect on middle- and high-income countries, while the other institutional indicators have a high impact on low-income countries. The quantile regression analysis shows that institutional qualities have stronger effects at a higher level of financial depth, almost double for those with lower levels. The threshold regression analysis indicates that government effectiveness, regulatory quality and the institutional index have more impact on financial deepening for countries with strong institutions than weak ones. Factors such as control of corruption, the rule of law, voice and accountability and political stability have mixed results with adverse effects when the institutions are above the threshold parameter. These results show a non-monotonic relationship between institutional factors and bank credit to the private sector. The results suggest that improving relevant institutional factors based on countries' individual situations may effectively stimulate debt financing in Africa.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 presents the underpinning theories and literature review, while section 3 and 4 outline this study's data and methodology. Findings and discussions are presented in section 5 . Lastly, policy implications and conclusion are discussed in section 6 .

2. Literature review

2.1 theories on institutional quality and financial deepening.

Financial development is a broader concept that encompasses four dimensions: financial deepening (depth), financial access, financial efficiency and financial stability ( Čihák et al. , 2012 ). Shaw (1973) defines financial deepening as an increase in the ratio of financial assets to gross domestic product (GDP) of an economy, where the accumulation of financial assets finances real assets. Financial depth is also referred to as the size of the financial sector to total economic output ( Čihák et al. , 2012 ). The preferred proxy for financial deepening in the literature is bank credit to the private sector as a percentage of GDP, which measures the allocation of funds to the real sector ( Čihák et al. , 2012 ; Dutta and Meierrieks, 2021 ). Bank credit to the private sector is also commonly used to proxy financial development, especially in Africa, where banks dominate the financial system. Financial intermediaries depend on the quality of institutions to efficiently allocate financial resources, develop innovative financial services and mitigate risks associated with information asymmetry ( Herger et al. , 2008 ). Thus, sound institutional quality contributes to financial sector development and innovations, reduces the cost of funds and intermediation and facilitates access to finance ( Marcelin and Mathur, 2014 ).

Institutions are instruments or constraints determining the interactions between parties in social, political or economic settings ( North, 1990 ). The proponents of neo-institutional theory agree that “institutions matter” because they create a level playing field in financial markets, a structure of economic incentives and efficient mobilization and allocation of resources, and consequently they influence financial market development and economic growth ( Acemoglu et al. , 2005 ; North, 1990 ). The law and finance theory underpins the origins of the legal system as the factor explaining differences in financial sector development and economic growth ( La Porta et al. , 1998 ). The authors argue that countries with inherited common-law systems have better development of financial markets and entrepreneurship due to the protection of private property rights than those with civil law systems. Lastly, the endowment theory emphasizes contracting and property rights institutions as necessary ingredients for economic performance ( Acemoglu and Johnson, 2005 ). The former regulates transactions and engagements between private parties such as lenders and borrowers, while the latter protects private parties against the government's power and expropriation.

The common institutional factors found in the literature are those defined by the World Bank's World Governance Indicators (WGI) and Political Risk Services' International Country Risk Guide (ICRG). The WGI measures six institutional factors: the rule of law, regulatory quality, government effectiveness, voice and accountability, control of corruption and political stability. The ICRG measures five institutional qualities: bureaucratic quality, risk of expropriation, law and order, corruption and government repudiation of contracts. This paper uses the WGI to develop the hypotheses because of broader coverage with more than 200 countries and broader definitions of institutional quality.

First, the rule of law refers to legal institutions and influences the development of the financial sector ( Beck et al. , 2005 ). Countries with a robust legal environment such as the police, courts, quality of contract enforcement and property rights are associated with deeper financial markets in terms of credit ( Djankov et al. , 2007 ; Haselmann and Wachtel, 2010 ; Troilo et al. , 2019 ). Financial intermediaries and entrepreneurs enter into voluntary agreements and rely on institutions or states to protect and enforce the agreed financial transactions ( Herger et al. , 2008 ). Legal and judicial institutional factors influence the enforcement of commercial disputes and property rights, consequently increasing financial intermediaries' confidence. Weak law enforcement of credit contracts reduces bank credit and increases the cost of intermediation due to prolonged and costly litigation to settle business disputes ( Shen et al. , 2009 ). Loan pricing is different across countries because of institutional and legal environments, among other factors ( Beck et al. , 2005 , 2011 ). Cost of funds, lending interest spread and net interest margins are higher in countries with weak institutional settings than in those with strong settings ( Marcelin and Mathur, 2014 ).

Second, in democratic regimes with political stability, voice and accountability allow financial intermediaries to operate freely and efficiently, allocating financial resources to profitable entrepreneurship activities, thus increasing financial access and depth ( Dutta and Meierrieks, 2021 ; Girma and Shortland, 2008 ). Political stability gives confidence to investors and entrepreneurs to increase investments and create new businesses. This, in turn, creates demand for financial intermediation in an economy. However, political instability and undemocratic governments erode confidence in the financial market and inhibit bank credit to the private sector ( Hasan et al ., 2009a ). Voice and accountability bring checks and balances on political institutions which determine economic policies ( Hasan et al ., 2009a ). Acemoglu and Robinson (2012) distinguish between “inclusive institutions” (with broader distribution of power) and “extractive institutions” (with power concentrated in elites and few people). Distortive macroeconomic policies and economic and political instabilities are associated with extractive institutions, which most African countries inherited from their colonial powers ( Acemoglu et al. , 2003 ). Political institutions, voice and accountability and democracy limit the interventions and repression of the state on financial markets, thus enhancing efficiency, competition and the depth of the banking sector ( Ho et al. , 2018 ; Karikari et al. , 2021 ).

Third, corruption is characterized as an “extractive institution” that leads to misallocation of resources and market inefficiencies due to abuse of power by a few for personal benefit ( Acemoglu et al. , 2003 ; Acemoglu and Robinson, 2012 ). Corruption causes inefficiency, limits financial markets access, increases economic costs and deters entrepreneurs from investing ( Acemoglu et al. , 2003 ; Khwaja and Mian, 2011 ). Corruption has a negative effect on the development of the financial sector, investments and economic growth ( Hasan et al ., 2009b ; King and Levine, 1993 ).

Fourth, effective governments can institute policies geared to reduce information asymmetry and increase the availability of collaterals, which are the critical bottlenecks of debt financing. This can be achieved by instituting policies that increase identity management, registration and tracking of movable and immovable assets as collaterals and defaulters' registration. Ineffective government crowds out bank credit to the private sector due to public debt and reduces private sector development ( Li and Skully, 1991 ).

Lastly, regulatory quality and good governance promote the development of the private sector and reduce the cost of doing business in an economy ( Feng and Yu, 2020 ). Furthermore, regulatory quality reduces banks' opportunistic behaviour of profit-seeking through minimizing deposit interest rates and maximizing lending interest rates ( Karikari et al. , 2021 ). Ineffective regulatory quality and the rule of law exacerbate the banking sector's liquidity and, consequently, the availability and accessibility of bank credit.

Institutional quality promotes domestic credit to the private sector from banks in Africa.

The relationship between institutional factors and bank credit to the private sector is non-monotonic in heterogeneous African countries.

2.2 Empirical reviews

There is a growing body of empirical literature analysing the effects of institutional factors and financial development on economic growth (e.g. Appiah et al. , 2020 ; Hasan et al ., 2009a ; Kutan et al. , 2017 ). These studies are based on well-established literature on the finance–growth nexus ( Levine, 2005 ), and their empirical findings overwhelmingly show that strong institutional quality and financial development significantly influence economic growth. Recent studies extend their empirical findings to analyse the impact of institutional quality and financial development on poverty reduction ( Kaidi et al. , 2019 ), inclusive growth ( Ntow-Gyamfi et al. , 2019 ) and natural resources rent ( Khan et al. , 2019 ). These authors find that well-developed institutions and financial markets positively impact poverty alleviation, inclusive growth and natural resources rent. This paper relates to studies investigating the direct influence of institutional factors on financial development. We discuss those studies that focus on developing and emerging countries as one strand and those focusing solely on Africa as another cluster.

For the strand of emerging and developing countries, Law and Azman-Saini (2012) analysed the effect of institutions on financial development in 63 countries using a Gaussian mixture model and data from WGI (1996–2004) and ICRG (1984–2004). They used the stock market and the banking sector development indicators. The authors constructed a single institutional quality by averaging WGI and ICRG factors separately to overcome the inter-correlations of these factors. Their findings demonstrate that the institutional index influences financial development, particularly in the banking sector, which is statistically significant. Cherif and Dreger (2016) examined the institutional determinants for financial development in 15 Middle East and Northern Africa (MENA) countries from 1990 to 2007 using a fixed effects (FE) model and ICRG data. The authors used bank credit to the private sector as a percentage of GDP to proxy financial depth. They also used market capitalization and bank assets as proxies for the development of the stock market and banking sector, respectively. Based on three institutional indicators, the authors showed that institutions are crucial for the banking sector and stock market development in MENA countries. Le et al. (2016) established that the institutional quality and governance index enhanced financial development in developing countries in 26 Asian and Pacific countries from 1995 to 2011 using the generalized method of moments (GMM) method on WGI data. The authors used PCA to develop a financial development index based on liquid liabilities to GDP, commercial bank assets and domestic credit to the private sector. Gani and Rasul (2020) indicated that the strength of legal systems, regulatory quality and the rule of law have a positive and strong influence on bank credit in 46 developing countries worldwide for 2004–2017. Their sample included only 10 African countries for which they employed a panel corrected standard errors (PCSE) and two-stage least squares (2SLS) for analysis. Their study was limited to four institutional indicators, which are not normalized to a standardized scale that would have improved the robustness of their results. Khan et al. (2020b) explored the effect of institutional factors on financial development in 15 emerging countries using 2SLS regression to analyse data from WGI (1996–2016) and ICRG (1984–2017). The authors used PCA to construct composite indexes for institutional quality. They used the banking sector and the stock market developments as proxies of financial development. Their findings show that political stability, government effectiveness and the rule of law positively and significantly impact financial development, whereas voice and accountability have a negative influence. Khan et al . (2020a) is another recent empirical study that uses WGI data and bank credit to the private sector as a proxy of financial development. Their findings show that regulatory quality, control of corruption and political stability positively influence financial development, whereas the rule of law negatively affected 189 countries from 2002 to 2017 using GMM.

The second strand of our empirical review focuses on the African continent. Fowowe (2014) investigated the effects of legal origins and legal effectiveness on the financial development of 39 African countries and concluded that the law and finance theory of La Porta et al. (1998) does not apply in African countries. Aluko and Ajayi (2018) examined different determinants of banking sector development in 25 Sub-Saharan African countries (SSA) from 1997 to 2014 using the GMM. The authors used an arithmetic mean of six WGIs as an index and found that institutional quality increased the credit to the private sector as a proxy of banking sector depth. Ntow-Gyamfi et al. (2019) established that regulatory quality interacting with financial development had a positive and significant effect on inclusive growth in 48 African countries from 1990 to 2016 using GMM, PCSE and FE models. The authors used only regulatory quality as an indicator for institutional quality and domestic credit to the private sector as a proxy for financial development. Aluko and Ibrahim (2020) analysed the impact of financial development on economic growth in 28 SSA countries from 1996 to 2015 using WGI institutional qualities as a regime-switching mechanism through threshold analysis. Their findings indicate that financial development has a significant and positive impact on economic growth irrespective of whether the country has weak or strong institutions. Kebede et al. (2021) explored the interaction of foreign banks and institutional quality on financial inclusion in 17 African countries for 2004–2018 using FE and GMM. The authors used PCA to construct an institutional index from WGIs. Their results show that the interaction between foreign banks and institutional quality promotes financial inclusion in Africa.

In summary, the literature establishes the effect of institutional factors on the finance–growth nexus and financial development, but some gaps are evident. First, few empirical studies investigate the impact of institutions on financial deepening, focusing on Africa. Second, the reviewed empirical studies in Africa use limited econometric models and do not scrutinize the continent's heterogeneity sufficiently. Thus, their results are inconclusive. Lastly, most studies either construct an institutional index or use a single institutional indicator and do not explain the impact of individual indicators.

We employed panel data from WGI and World Development Indicators (WDI) to analyse the influence of institutions on financial deepening in 50 African countries for the period 2000–2019. Table 1 summarizes all the study's variables, definitions and descriptive statistics. Only four African countries (Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia and South Sudan) are excluded because of incomplete data.

We used PCA not only to construct the institutional quality index but also to analyse the impact of each institutional indicator. The dependent variable, domestic credit to the private sector by banks as a percentage of GDP, is widely used in literature as the proxy for financial deepening. The control variables are GDP per capita, trade openness, inflation and mobile phone subscription for 100 inhabitants. GDP per capita tends to influence the demand and supply of deposits and loans in an economy ( Boadi et al. , 2017 ). Trade openness enhances the development of the banking sector through increased demand for financial services emanating from imports and exports of goods and services ( Menyah et al. , 2014 ). Inflation reduces the real value of the loan and erodes the real interest returns on credit ( Boadi et al. , 2017 ). Mobile phone subscriptions significantly increase financial depth ( Shamim, 2007 ).

4. Methodology

This study employed different panel econometric models to analyse the effect of institutions on financial deepening with consideration to the heterogeneity of African countries. First, the Random Prais–Winsten regression with PCSE with panel-specific autoregressive ( PSAR1) option was used to analyse the influence of institutions on financial deepening in an aggregate scenario of 50 countries and disaggregated scenario based on different gross national incomes (GNI). The study used the PCSE with PSAR1 for two reasons: (1) it is more efficient than other static panel data estimators, especially when the number of time series ( T ) is less than the number of cross-sectional series ( N ) ( Chen et al. , 2009 ) and (2) it can handle the potential presence of cross-sectional dependence and heteroscedasticity ( Beck and Katz, 1995 ). See diagnostics results in Appendix . This method has been used by other empirical studies analysing the relationship between institutional quality and financial development ( Gani and Rasul, 2020 ; Ntow-Gyamfi et al. , 2019 ). However, the shortcoming of the PCSE estimator is the endogeneity problem emanating from the lagged dependent variable. Thus, for robustness check, we employed the system GMM, which removes biases resulting from omitted variables, endogeneity and weak instrument problem and measurement errors ( Blundell and Bond, 1998 ). Second, we used quantile regression to analyse countries with a high financial deepening relative to those with low levels. Quantile regression is considered robust to outliers and manages data heterogeneity ( Jenkins et al. , 2021 ; Koenker and Bassett, 1978 ). Third, we used threshold regression to evaluate and contrast countries with poor and robust institutional qualities. The threshold regression enabled us to analyse the effects of institutional quality below or above a threshold value ( Hansen, 1999 ). Fourth, we used the logarithmic transformation for the variables with high standard deviations, as shown in Table 1 . Fifth, the correlation matrix (see Appendix ) shows that the explanatory variables are highly correlated with coefficients between 0.6 and 0.9 at a 1% significance level. Thus, we ran individual regressions for each institutional factor to account for its effects on bank credit to the private sector. Lastly, we used the RAWGraphs software to visualize data with bubble graphs and we found a positive correlation between institutional qualities and bank credit to the private sector (see Appendix ).

The study adopted the model used by Djankov et al. (2007) to investigate the determinants of domestic credit to the private sector: (1) F D i t = β 0 + β 1 I N S i t + α i C O i t + μ i t where I N S i t represents vectors of institutional factors that influence financial deepening ( FD it ); C O i t is the vector of control variables; β and α i are parameters and μ i t is errors' vector; i = 1 … n is the number of cross-sectional units and t = 1 … T is the number of observations for panel i . A lag of financial deepening ( F D i t − 1 ) is introduced for the dynamic panel data model to make Equation (2) . (2) F D i t = β 0 + β 1 F D i t − 1 + β 2 I N S i t + α i C O i t + μ i t

This study also adopted a quantile model (see Jenkins et al. , 2021 for a description of the method) and a threshold model (see Wang, 2015 for description of the method) to carry out further alternative analysis as expressed in Equations (3) and (4) , respectively: (3) F D i t = β p I N S i t + α i C O i t + μ i t where β p indicates coefficient at the p quantile. (4) F D i t =   μ + I N S i t ( q i t < γ ) β 1 + I N S i t ( q i t ≥ γ ) β 2 + α i C O i t + μ i t + e i t where q i t is the threshold variable and γ is a threshold parameter that divides the equation into the two regimes with coefficients β 1 and β 2 . μ i t and e i t are individual effects and disturbance, respectively. PCSE, system GMM, quantile and threshold regressions use Equations (1), (2), (3) and (4) , respectively.

5. Results and discussions

5.1 results from aggregated countries.

The PCSE results shown in Table 2 (Panel A) demonstrate good explanatory power with R 2 for different regressions ranging from 0.6 to 0.8, which suggests a good fit for our model. The PCSE results are also in line with the system GMM in Table 2 (Panel B), where the Hansen and autoregressive (AR(2)) tests report uncorrelated disturbance terms. The lag of bank credit to the private sector is positive and statistically significant, demonstrating a good fit to our system GMM model. The results of the aggregated scenario for 50 African countries show that institutional qualities have a positive and significant influence on financial deepening in Africa, which is consistent with our expectations. Collectively, the institutional quality index has a positive and significant effect on bank credit to the private sector in Africa using both estimators PCSE and system GMM (column 7 of Table 2 ) consistent with previous empirical studies ( Aluko and Ibrahim, 2020 ; Le et al. , 2016 ) which employ the WGI institutional quality index. Thus, hypothesis H 1 is accepted.

Control of corruption positively and significantly influences bank credit to the private sector at a 1% significance level for the estimators, PCSE and system GMM. This is in line with Khan et al. 's (2020a) study in developing and emerging countries. It implies that control of corruption encourages banks to provide credit to the private sector without distorting behaviours for private gains. Government effectiveness has a positive and robust effect on bank credit to the private sector, as shown in column 2 of Table 2 . This is consistent with the findings of Khan et al. (2020b) and suggests that the government's ability to formulate and implement quality policies and adhere to such policies gives confidence to the banking sector. For example, supporting government policies such as guarantee schemes have demonstrated increased bank lending to SMEs ( Riding et al. , 2007 ).

Regulatory quality is statistically significant with a positive impact on bank credit to the private sector (column 3 of Table 2 ), which is consistent with the findings of Gani and Rasul (2020) . This implies that the government's ability to implement sound regulations and policies that promote private sector development is an essential stimulus for the banking sector to continue lending to the private sector.

The rule of law positively and strongly impacts bank credit to the private sector at 1 and 10% significance levels for PCSE and system GMM estimators, respectively. The results are consistent with previous studies ( Gani and Rasul, 2020 ; Shen et al. , 2009 ; Troilo et al. , 2019 ) that the rule of law has a positive and significant effect on bank credit. This shows that property rights, quality of contract enforcement and courts are crucial motivators for banks to extend loans to the private sector.

Voice and accountability have positive and significant effects on bank credit to the private sector at a 1% significance level for both estimators, consistent with the results of Khan et al. (2020a) . Freedom and fundamental rights of the society to allow people to express themselves and pursue their social and economic ambitions may increase the demand for credit. In contrast, Khan et al. (2020b) found a negative influence on financial development.

Political stability and the absence of violence positively and significantly impact bank credit to the private sector at 10 and 5% significance levels for PCSE and GMM estimators, respectively ( Table 2 , column 6). These findings are in line with Huang (2010) who concluded that well-functioning political systems tend to increase confidence to investors and entrepreneurs to engage in economic activities with a long-term view, thus promoting financial sector development. Nevertheless, Batila and Bongo (2021) have contrasting results that political stability negatively affects financial development in central Africa.

As for the control variables, GDP per capita and mobile phones have positive and significant effects on bank credit to the private sector when regressed with each institutional factors using the PCSE estimator ( Table 2 ). However, the results are different with system GMM, where the control variables did not show significant effects except the negative effect of inflation when regressed with political stability.

5.2 Results from disaggregated countries

Although the results for aggregated countries discussed in section 5.1 show that institutional indicators have a significant and positive effect on bank credit to the private sector, analysing countries with different levels of institution, credit and income provides additional information. The results in Table 3 show that the relationship between institutional qualities and bank credit to the private sector is non-monotonic. Thus, hypothesis H 2 is accepted.

5.2.1 Different levels of bank credits

The quantile regression results in Table 3 (columns 1–4) show that at a higher level of bank credit to the private sector (75th percentile), institutional qualities have more substantial effects on bank credit, almost double compared to lower levels (25th percentile). The coefficients of all explanatory variables increase as the quantiles of bank credit to the private sector increase (that is Q.25, Q.50 and Q.75). For example, the coefficient of government effectiveness is estimated to be around 6.901 for the 25th percentile, increases to 8.375 for the 50th percentile and then triples for the 75th percentile with a coefficient of 20.91. These results are more striking than the earlier analyses discussed in section 5.1 and previous studies on the effects of institutional qualities on financial development ( Aluko and Ajayi, 2018 ; Aluko and Ibrahim, 2020 ; Cherif and Dreger, 2016 ; Fowowe, 2014 ; Kebede et al. , 2021 ; Khan et al ., 2020a , b ; Law and Azman-Saini, 2012 ; Le et al. , 2016 ). Furthermore, the interquartile regression confirms that the difference between the 0.25 and 0.75 quantiles is statistically significant ( Table 3 , column 4). The control variables not reported in Table 3 have mixed results: mobile phone subscriptions have a positive and significant impact on all quantiles, with coefficients increasing from the 25th to 75th percentiles. GDP per capita has only a positive and significant impact for the 75th percentile. Trade openness has a positive and significant effect at the 25th and 75th percentiles only. Inflation has an insignificant effect in all percentiles.

5.2.2 Different level of gross national incomes

The World Bank classifies the world's economies based on GNI per capita in current USD. Our sample of 50 African countries has 19 low-income countries and 31 middle-income countries. The results in Table 3 (columns 5 and 6) show that individual institutional qualities, namely, control of corruption, regulatory quality, the rule of law, voice and accountability and political stability, have more effect on low-income countries than on middle-income countries. Government effectiveness has a higher effect on middle-income countries with a coefficient of 0.41 compared to low-income countries with a coefficient of 0.31. Collectively, the institutional factors using an index have more effect on low-income countries than middle-incomes in Africa. The results of control variables not reported in Table 3 have an insignificant impact except for mobile phone subscriptions, which have a positive and significant impact on bank credit for both low- and middle-income countries.

5.2.3 Different level of institutional qualities

Table 3 (columns 8 and 9) presents threshold regression results for the countries divided into two regimes based on the threshold value. Countries below the threshold value (column 7) have weak institutional qualities, while those above the threshold parameter are classified as countries with strong institutional qualities. Government effectiveness, regulatory quality and the institutional index positively and significantly impact banks where their coefficients double when institutions are above the threshold value, which is consistent with the study of Dutta and Meierrieks (2021) . However, control of corruption, the rule of law, voice and accountability and political stability have mixed results with negative effects when the institutions are above the threshold value.

6. Policy implications and conclusion

We empirically demonstrated that institutional qualities promote financial deepening in Africa. We contribute to the literature by examining the effects of institutional indicators on financial deepening in Africa, individually and collectively, and discussing their implications on SME financing; scrutinizing various analysis scenarios to account for different national income levels, levels of financial deepening and institutional qualities and employing different estimation econometric methods to account for the heterogeneity of African countries. Our key findings show that: (1) with homogenous analyses, institutional factors promote financial deepening in Africa, both for six indicators individually and collectively as an institutional index and (2) with heterogeneous analyses, institutional factors have a different effect on financial deepening. Government effectiveness has a high effect on middle- and high-income countries, while control of corruption, regulatory quality, voice and accountability, the rule of law, political stability and institutional quality index have a high impact on low-income countries. At higher levels of bank credit to the private sector, all institutional qualities have stronger effects than those with lower levels. Government effectiveness, regulatory quality and the institutional index impact financial deepening more in countries with sound institutions than those with weak institutions. These results suggest that policymakers and development partners can engender sound institutional quality to stimulate debt financing, the primary source of financing for SMEs and entrepreneurs in Africa, by paying attention to countries' heterogeneity. For example, middle-income countries can focus more on improving government effectiveness than on other institutional qualities to enhance financial deepening. In conclusion, strengthening institutional qualities is necessary but not sufficient to promote financial deepening in Africa. Other factors such as technological innovations macroeconomic policies and financial conditions can be integrated to increase financial deepening in Africa.

Variables measures, definitions and descriptive statistics

Source(s): Estimation results by authors. Standard errors in parentheses; *** p  < 0.01, ** p  < 0.05, * p  < 0.1; GDP, Gross domestic product; PCSE, panel corrected standard errors

The supplementary data is available online for this article at: doi: 10.17632/vcfsgryyb4.2

Acemoglu , D. and Johnson , S. ( 2005 ), “ Unbundling institutions ”, The Journal of Political Economy , Vol.  113 No.  5 , pp.  949 - 995 .

Acemoglu , D. and Robinson , J. ( 2012 ), Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty , Crown Publishing Group , London .

Acemoglu , D. , Johnson , S. , Robinson , J. and Thaicharoen , Y. ( 2003 ), “ Institutional causes, macroeconomic symptoms: volatility, crises and growth ”, Journal of Monetary Economics , Vol.  50 No.  1 , pp.  49 - 123 .

Acemoglu , D. , Johnson , S. and Robinson , J. ( 2005 ), “ Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth ”, in Aghion , P. and Durlauf , S.N. (Eds), Handbook of Economic Growth , Elsevier , New York , Vol.  1A , pp.  385 - 472 .

Aluko , O.A. and Ajayi , M.A. ( 2018 ), “ Determinants of banking sector developments: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa countries ”, Borsa Istanbul Review , Vol.  18 No.  2 , pp.  122 - 139 .

Aluko , O.A. and Ibrahim , M. ( 2020 ), “ Institutions and the financial development–economic growth nexus in sub-Saharan Africa ”, Economics Notes , Vol.  49 No.  3 , pp.  1 - 16 .

Appiah , M. , Li , F. and Frowne , D.I. ( 2020 ), “ Financial development, institutional quality and economic growth: evidence from ECOWAS countries ”, Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies , Vol.  11 No.  1 , pp.  6 - 17 .

Batila , P. and Bongo , G. ( 2021 ), “ The role of the quality of institutions in financial development of CEMAC countries ”, Modern Economy , Vol.  12 , pp.  452 - 468 .

Beck , T. ( 2013 ), “ Bank financing to SMEs: lessons from the literature ”, National Institute Economic Review , Vol.  225 No.  August 2013 , pp.  23 - 38 .

Beck , N. and Katz , J. ( 1995 ), “ What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data ”, American Political Science Review , Vol.  89 No.  3 , pp.  634 - 647 .

Beck , T. , Demirguc-Kunt , A. and Maksimovic , V. ( 2005 ), “ Financial and legal constraints to growth: does firm size matter? ”, The Journal of Finance , Vol.  60 No.  1 , pp.  137 - 177 .

Beck , T. , Demirgüç-Kunt , A. and Pería , M. ( 2011 ), “ Bank financing for SMEs: evidence across countries and bank ownership types ”, Journal of Financial Services Research , Vol.  39 , pp.  35 - 54 .

Berger , A.N. and Udell , G.F. ( 2006 ), “ A more complete conceptual framework for SME finance ”, Journal of Banking and Finance , Vol.  30 No.  11 , pp.  2945 - 2966 .

Blundell , R. and Bond , S. ( 1998 ), “ Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models ”, Journal of Econometrics , Vol.  87 No.  1 , pp.  115 - 143 .

Boadi , I. , Dana , L. , Mertens , G. and Mensah , L. ( 2017 ), “ SMEs' financing and banks' profitability: a ‘good date’ for banks in Ghana? ”, Journal of African Business , Vol.  18 No.  2 , pp.  257 - 277 .

Cao-Alvira , J.J. and Palacios-Chacón , L.A. ( 2021 ), “ Financial deepening and business creation: a regional analysis of Colombia ”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade , Vol.  57 No.  3 , pp.  875 - 890 .

Chen , X. , Lin , S. and Reed , R.W. ( 2009 ), “ A Monte Carlo evaluation of the efficiency of the PCSE estimator ”, Applied Economics Letters , Vol.  17 No.  1 , pp.  7 - 10 .

Cherif , M. and Dreger , C. ( 2016 ), “ Institutional determinants of financial development in MENA countries ”, Review of Development Economics , Vol.  20 No.  3 , pp.  670 - 680 .

Čihák , M. , Demirgüç-Kunt , A. , Feyen , E. and Levine , R. ( 2012 ), “ Benchmarking financial development around the world ”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6175 , Washington, DC , pp.  1 - 56 .

Djankov , S. , McLiesh , C. and Shleifer , A. ( 2007 ), “ Private credit in 129 countries ”, Journal of Financial Economics , Vol.  84 No.  2 , pp.  299 - 329 .

Dutta , N. and Meierrieks , D. ( 2021 ), “ Financial development and entrepreneurship ”, International Review of Economics and Finance , Vol.  73 No.  2021 , pp.  114 - 126 .

Feng , Y. and Yu , X. ( 2020 ), “ The impact of institutions on financial development: evidence from East Asian countries ”, Australian Economic Papers , Vol.  60 , pp.  122 - 137 .

Fowowe , B. ( 2014 ), “ Law and finance revisited: evidence from African countries ”, The South African Journal of Economics , Vol.  82 No.  2 , pp.  193 - 208 .

Gani , A. and Rasul , T. ( 2020 ), “ The institutional quality effect on credits provided by the banks ”, International Advances in Economic Research , Vol.  26 , pp.  249 - 258 .

Girma , S. and Shortland , A. ( 2008 ), “ The political economy of financial development ”, Oxford Economic Papers , Vol.  60 No.  4 , pp.  567 - 596 .

Guiso , L. , Sapienza , P. and Zingales , L. ( 2004 ), “ The role of social capital in financial development ”, The American Economic Review , Vol.  94 No.  3 , pp.  526 - 556 .

Hansen , B. ( 1999 ), “ Threshold effects in no-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference ”, Journal of Econometrics , Vol.  93 No.  2 , pp.  345 - 368 .

Hasan , I. , Wachtel , P. and Zhou , M. ( 2009a ), “ Institutional development, financial deepening and economic growth: evidence from China ”, Journal of Banking and Finance , Vol.  33 , pp.  157 - 170 .

Hasan , I. , Wang , H. and Zhou , M. ( 2009b ), “ Do better institutions improve bank efficiency? Evidence from a transitional economy ”, Managerial Finance , Vol.  35 No.  2 , pp.  107 - 127 .

Haselmann , R. and Wachtel , P. ( 2010 ), “ Institutions and bank behaviour: legal environment, legal perception, and the composition of bank lending ”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking , Vol.  42 No.  5 , pp.  965 - 984 .

Herger , N. , Hodler , R. and Lobsiger , M. ( 2008 ), “ What determines financial development? Culture, institutions or trade ”, Review of World Economies , Vol.  144 No.  3 , pp.  558 - 587 .

Ho , C.-Y. , Huang , S. , Shi , H. and Wu , J. ( 2018 ), “ Financial deepening and innovation: the role of political institutions ”, World Development , Vol.  109 , pp.  1 - 13 .

Huang , Y. ( 2010 ), “ Political institutions and financial development: an empirical study ”, World Development , Vol.  38 No.  12 , pp.  1667 - 1677 .

Jenkins , H. , Alshareef , E. and Mohamad , A. ( 2021 ), “ The impact of corruption on commercial banks' credit risk: evidence from a panel quantile regression ”, International Journal of Finance and Economics , No.  2021 , pp.  1 - 12 .

Kaidi , N. , Mensi , S. and Ben Amor , M. ( 2019 ), “ Financial development, institutional quality and poverty reduction: worldwide evidence ”, Social Indicators Research , Vol.  141 No.  1 , pp.  131 - 156 .

Karikari , N.K. , Gyan , K.K. , Khan , M.A.H. and Kusi , B.A. ( 2021 ), “ Institutional quality and social cost of intermediation in Africa: does the level of financial market development matter? ”, International Journal of Finance and Economics , No.  2021 , pp.  1 - 12 .

Kebede , J. , Selvanathan , S. and Naranpanawa , A. ( 2021 ), “ Foreign bank presence, institutional quality, and financial inclusion: evidence from Africa ”, Economic Modelling , Vol.  102 No.  2021 , pp.  1 - 15 .

Khan , M.A. , Khan , M.A. , Abdulahi , M.E. , Liaqat , I. and Shah , S.S.H. ( 2019 ), “ Institutional quality and financial development: the United States perspective ”, Journal of Multinational Financial Management , Vol.  49 , pp.  67 - 80 .

Khan , H. , Khan , S. and Zuojun , F. ( 2020a ), “ Institutional quality and financial development: evidence from developing and emerging economies ”, Global Business Review , January . doi: 10.1177/09721509198923662 .

Khan , M.A. , Kong , D. , Xiang , J. and Zhang , J. ( 2020b ), “ Impact of institutional quality on financial development: cross-country evidence based on emerging and growth-leading economies ”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade , Vol.  56 No.  15 , pp.  3829 - 3845 .

Khwaja , A.I. and Mian , A. ( 2011 ), “ Rent seeking and corruption in financial markets ”, Annual Review of Economics , Vol.  3 No.  1 , pp.  579 - 600 .

King , R.G. and Levine , R. ( 1993 ), “ Finance, entrepreneurship and growth: theory and evidence ”, Journal of Monetary Economics , Vol.  32 No.  3 , pp.  513 - 542 .

Koenker , R. and Bassett , G. ( 1978 ), “ Regression quantiles ”, Econometrica , Vol.  46 No.  1 , pp.  33 - 50 .

Kutan , A.M. , Samargandi , N. and Sohag , K. ( 2017 ), “ Does institutional quality matter for financial development and growth? Further evidence from MENA countries ”, Australian Economic Papers , Vol.  56 No.  3 , pp.  228 - 248 .

La Porta , R. , Lopez-de-Silanes , F. and Vishny , R. ( 1998 ), “ Law and finance ”, Journal of Political Economy , Vol.  106 No.  6 , pp.  113 - 1155 .

Law , S.H. and Azman-Saini , W.N.W. ( 2012 ), “ Institutional quality, governance, and financial development ”, Economics of Governance , Vol.  13 No.  3 , pp.  217 - 236 .

Le , T. , Kim , J. and Lee , M. ( 2016 ), “ Institutional quality, trade openness, and financial sector development in Asia: an empirical investigation ”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade , Vol.  52 No.  5 , pp.  1047 - 1059 .

Levine , R. ( 2005 ), “ Finance and growth: theory and evidence ”, in Aghion , P. and Durlauf , S. (Eds), Handbook of Economic Growth , Elsevier , New York , Vol.  1A , pp.  865 - 934 .

Li , K. and Skully , M. ( 1991 ), “ Financial deepening and institutional development: some Asian experiences ”, Savings and Development , Vol.  15 No.  2 , pp.  147 - 165 .

Marcelin , I. and Mathur , I. ( 2014 ), “ Financial development, institutions and banks ”, International Review of Financial Analysis , Vol.  31 , pp.  25 - 33 .

Menyah , K. , Nazlioglu , S. and Wolde-Rufael , Y. ( 2014 ), “ Financial development, trade openness and economic growth in African countries: new insights from a panel causality approach ”, Economic Modelling , Vol.  37 No.  C , pp.  386 - 394 .

North , D. ( 1990 ), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance , Cambridge University Press .

Ntow-Gyamfi , M. , Bokpin , G.A. , Aboagye , A.Q. and Ackah , C.G. ( 2019 ), “ Financial development, institutional quality and inclusive growth in Africa ”, Global Business Review , December . doi: 10.1177/0972150919875367 .

Riding , A. , Madill , J. and Haines , G. , Jr ( 2007 ), “ Incrementality of SME loan guarantees ”, Small Business Economics , Vol.  29 Nos 1/2 , pp.  47 - 61 .

Shamim , F. ( 2007 ), “ The ICT environment, financial sector and economic growth: a cross-country analysis ”, Journal of Economic Studies , Vol.  34 No.  4 , pp.  352 - 370 .

Shaw , E.S. ( 1973 ), Financial Deepening in Economic Development , Oxford University Press , New York .

Shen , Y. , Shen , M. , Xu , Z. and Bai , Y. ( 2009 ), “ Bank size and small- and medium-sized enterprises (SME) lending: evidence from China ”, World Development , Vol.  37 No.  4 , pp.  800 - 811 .

Troilo , M. , Walkup , B. , Abe , M. and Lee , S. ( 2019 ), “ Legal systems and the financing of working capital ”, International Review of Economics and Finance , Vol.  64 No.  2019 , pp.  641 - 656 .

Wang , Q. ( 2015 ), “ Fixed-effect panel threshold model using Stata ”, The Stata Journal , Vol.  15 No.  1 , pp.  121 - 134 .

Corresponding author

Related articles, all feedback is valuable.

Please share your general feedback

Report an issue or find answers to frequently asked questions

Contact Customer Support